← All Writing

From the Desk  ·  AI Strategy  ·  August 31, 2026

Big Companies Hired Someone to Own AI. Main Street Got Another Job.

Seventy-six percent of the large organizations in IBM's 2026 CEO survey say they now have a chief AI officer.

A year earlier, it was 26 percent.

Small business has a different system.

The owner reads about AI at 10:47 p.m., opens six tabs, tries one tool, forgets which password they used, then goes back to payroll.

That is the gap.

Big companies are hiring one person to own AI. Main Street cannot.

The work does not care. It still has to get done, usually after a full day of other work.

The benchmark is not 76 percent

IBM surveyed 2,000 CEOs across 33 countries and 21 industries.

Useful survey. Wrong room.

These are companies that can create a C-suite job because someone said "operating model" before lunch. A plumbing company with 14 trucks is not hiring a chief AI officer. No search committee. No press release with "transformation" in it.

But 76 percent is still useful. It shows what large companies believe AI needs: an owner. Someone with the authority to pick priorities, set rules, train people, stop bad ideas, and show whether any of it made money.

Now look at Main Street.

The Census Bureau found 37 percent of businesses with at least 250 employees were using AI in early 2026. Among businesses with four or fewer employees: less than 20 percent. And in the six months to May 2026, AI use grew at businesses with 20-plus employees. Under 20, it did not move.

That does not prove AI has buried small business. It proves the starting lines are different, and one group is already running.

To be fair, no solid evidence yet shows AI has already widened the big-vs-small productivity gap. It does not need to. The starting lines are warning enough.

Small business does not have an AI problem

It has an ownership problem.

The National Federation of Independent Business found 24 percent of small employers used AI in 2025. Three out of four did not.

Of those using it, 30 percent said it increased productivity. Only 5 percent said it increased revenue.

That is not failure. It is early. It is what happens when a tool arrives before anyone has decided what result they want from it.

Buying AI is not the same as owning AI. Every garage in America has a treadmill that proves the difference.

"Buying AI is not the same as owning AI. Every garage in America has a treadmill that proves the difference."

The job is bigger than knowing the tools

A chief AI officer is not the person who knows the most AI products. Products change every Tuesday.

The job is to decide where AI improves the business. Not where it looks impressive. Where it saves hours, cuts mistakes, or makes money.

The job is to set the rules. What can employees paste into an AI system? What stays private? Which answers need a human check?

The job is to train people, or somewhere in the gap, Kevin uploads the customer list because a chatbot promised to "unlock insights."

Then the job is to keep score. What did we spend? What got faster? What made money? What should stop?

This is not a technology job. It is a business job with technology in it.

The stakes are not a quarterly target

Here is what corporate America will never say out loud.

For fifty years, new technology meant the machine ate more of your day. More software to learn. More meetings about the meetings.

AI is the first one that can run the other direction.

A business where AI owns the admin is a business where the owner gets dinner back. Where people work the day and then go live the rest of it.

That is the actual prize. Not beating the Fortune 500.

Getting your life back while the work still gets done.

The big companies hired a chief to chase efficiency. Fine. Main Street's version is better: hand the machine the grind, and give the people the hours.

None of it happens if nobody owns it.

Five questions for Main Street

A small business does not need another chief. It needs an owner.

That could be the founder, the operations manager, or the office manager who knows how the business actually runs. The wrong choice is the person who loves AI the most. Choose the person who understands the business problem best.

Without one, you do not have an AI leader. You have an AI mascot. Corporate America has plenty of those. They usually get a committee and a logo.

Make your owner answer five questions:

1. What business result are we trying to improve?
2. What information are we willing to share?
3. Where does a human check the work?
4. Who trains the team?
5. What number will prove this worked?

No title required. No lanyard required. Definitely no 84-page "AI transformation roadmap" that spends 19 pages defining the word roadmap.

The gap that matters

The winners will not be the businesses that tried every tool first.

They will be the ones that picked a few real problems, set clear rules, trained their people, measured the result, and then went home on time.

So ask the question now:

Who owns AI in your business?

If the answer is "everyone," the answer is nobody.

And if the answer is nobody, your employees, your vendors, and your larger competitors are already making the decisions for you.

More From the Desk